Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Its strange & funny..
Is it jealously or enlightenment? ;-)
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Marriage..the why of it
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:48 AM) the most basic stimulus
Kapil Jain... (9:48 AM) fear
Kapil Jain... (9:48 AM) :)
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:48 AM) of?
Kapil Jain... (9:48 AM) several things
Kapil Jain... (9:49 AM) to say, basic human characterstics are fear and laziness, fear makes us do things, laziness makes us not do things
Kapil Jain... (9:49 AM) we jump from one to another broadly based on these two
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:50 AM) hmm..so then there are different flavours of fear..
Kapil Jain... (9:50 AM) everything is driven by fear
Kapil Jain... (9:50 AM) whatever happens
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:50 AM) hmm..interesting observation
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:50 AM) i hadn't thought of it in that way
Kapil Jain... (9:50 AM) :)
Kapil Jain... (9:50 AM) i have more free time, and what is there to do :)
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:50 AM) so, people who are unmarried all their life, are more secure?
Kapil Jain... (9:51 AM) no no can not be concluded that way
Kapil Jain... (9:51 AM) they might be suffering from fear of failure
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:51 AM) so..fear gets people to marry and the same fear gets them to not marry as well
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:52 AM) yeah..sounds logical..
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:52 AM) so then its a question of which fear can be overcome..that would then result in people one decision over the other
Kapil Jain... (9:52 AM) yes, these are wholistic characterstics which are behind the rational structure we create for defining our actions
Kapil Jain... (9:54 AM) you can say that, yes
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:54 AM) you should definately comment on our blog..
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:54 AM) it will be interesting :-)
Kapil Jain... (9:54 AM) you can use this chat as comment, can't you?
Sudhindra Balaji... (9:54 AM) oh yes..and i will..in 5mins you'll see it up on the blog
Kapil Jain... (9:57 AM) and one more thing to think about, you will know how when you know who moves the torch
Sudhindra Balaji... (10:00 AM) hmm.. :-)
Kapil Jain... (10:00 AM) :)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Decentralized customer satisfaction touch-points
If the perception of value and the addition of tangible value truly is added by the 'work on the floor', must the developers not be 'empowered and mentored' to enhance these 'customer satisfaction touch-points'? Thereby, taking customer satisfaction initiatives from a 'top driven' approach to a more 'decentralized' one?
Friday, April 24, 2009
Employee loyalty
Monday, June 30, 2008
Org Struct - 1
One traditional way is to pre-determine a ratio of manager to reportees. But does this method do proper justice to maximisation of productivity?
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
KRAs
Monday, June 23, 2008
The Emotion Map
Sapphire: by the way ... i am very sad
Think Engage: for what
Sapphire: please don scorn at me ... but its just that my ex girlfriend just got married and i saw her photos so that made be feel very sad
Think Engage: you have like...
and fever and all is it
pls...
Sapphire: no no ... please ... fever is for getting drenched
this i just saw last night ...
Think Engage: hmm
Sapphire: but i realise that i made some wrong investments and wrong decision very early in life
Think Engage: what wrong investment
Sapphire: emotionally .. i am saying
Think Engage: ah ..
Sapphire: you know what ... i was trying to analyse what exactly makes you feel sad
it is sometimes very interesting to see exactly which strand of thought makes you feel bad ... it is like finding out which thread in a multithreaded java program is hogging the max memory
are you getting it?
Think Engage: hmm yeah
go on
Sapphire: like in this case, the very thought that now i do not have any importance in a person's life who, at one point in time, considered me to the most important ... this strand of thought makes me feel sad ...
Think Engage: will you feel better if you were considered important in someone elses' life?
Sapphire: no its not a compensating equation
Think Engage: no - i asked to isolate the root cause
it may be a 'need' to be loved, or it may be a need to be loved by a particular person
Sapphire: i understand ,,, thats why i am trying to give you a model based answer
ok ... what i think is this ... lets talk in terms of models
then ...
every person you interact with ... gives rise to a certain set of feelings ... emotions
now ... lets broadly categorise emotions as positive and negative
to make things simpler
then ... one negative emotion cannot be negated by positive emotions generated in another relation
whatever is generated ... remains
but ... at amy given point in time ...
Think Engage: yes - but you must also ackowledge that over a period of time, the intensity of effect it has does decrease
Sapphire: we say that we are doing good, not doing good, or maybe doing OK ... based on the wholistic map of all your emotions taken together
is this clear?
Think Engage: yeah
Sapphire: right ... and our mind is like a torch ... which hovers over the map ... whenever whichever emotion is hoghlighted, we momentarily get into that emotion
does this model sound 'sound'?
that i think takes care of the time factor also
doesnt it?
Think Engage: yeah
Sapphire: and intensity ... does not decrease ... it is just that the older emotions gets pushed towards the edge of the map ... while new ones generate at the center
so chances of them getting highlighted get lesser ... but when they ARE highlighted ... then you get into the old mode
Think Engage: hmm
Sapphire: the hopeful part is ... our mind ... the torch ... always hovers
Think Engage: so the question really is how can the torch focus for a longer period on what we want, and how soon can we push things to the edge
Sapphire: yes absolutely
you got it
Think Engage: and hash (or whatever it is called) is certainly not a solution to it
Sapphire: do you think this model is scalable to other areas of emotional intelligence?
forget that part
this is serious talk
do you think this is a scalable model?
Think Engage: it will be more complex when there are overlaps
Sapphire: what overlaps?
like?
Think Engage: you still have to deal with related people
Sapphire: yes but thats external to the system ... there will be interfaces defined ... but i am talking only about the core processing
Think Engage: hmm
Sapphire: what hmm ... i think we should develop this model to see whether it covers all areas of emotional intelligence ... then it may be possible to develop measures to fix things when they go wrong
Think Engage: how would you fix this thing for instance?
Sapphire: dont you think this can be a worthwhile introspection?
just like the way you said, then the solution is to push the older emotion faster towards the edge
what???
Think Engage: yes - i'm thinking HOW
Sapphire: yes ... thats the application part ...
and that will be different for different people ... so more important is to develop the principle behind it
Think Engage: isn't this already addressed in psychology?
Sapphire: i dont know ... i am sure this is a pretty intuitive model ... so somebody might have thought about it
btw ... i am going to put this on blog too
Think Engage: i think this is what they do in 'therapy'
yeah - put
you are btw not adding naything to itchybrains - i will now kick you for that
Sapphire: but that apart ... let us develop the model further ... iyou want
if you*